Indéfectibilité et obéissance à l’Eglise enseignante — + Archidiacre +

Démontre que l’Eglise enseignante ne peut jamais enseigner l’erreur et que l’Eglise enseignée lui doit toujours obéissance Indéfectibilité et obéissance à l’Eglise enseignante — + Archidiacre + Here is an excellent resource on the indefectibility of the church as it relates to sedevancantism by Semper Papiste (which google translate can with one click translate into English)Continue reading “Indéfectibilité et obéissance à l’Eglise enseignante — + Archidiacre +”

Against Sedevacantism: Habemus Papam — The Catholic of Honor

By Sedevacantism, I mean the belief that the See of Peter has been empty since the death of Pope Pius XII in 1958. According to sedevacantists, his successors, John XXIII and onward, are usurpers or antipopes. A few would call John XXIII valid and no one after him, but generally it ends at Pius XII. […]Continue reading “Against Sedevacantism: Habemus Papam — The Catholic of Honor”

No Idol was the Statue at the Vatican: Not Pachamama but Mary: Watch the Video at 13:20

The video of the event ends the debate. No idols present. Watch the video of the event. (Link Here) Go to 13:20 and listen when the woman gives the statue to Francis and says Our Lady of the Amazon. The Statue was Mary no idol worship. The latter Vatican remark about it not being MaryContinue reading “No Idol was the Statue at the Vatican: Not Pachamama but Mary: Watch the Video at 13:20”

Vatican II Interpretation Book Review

Perhaps the most popular books on Vatican II events may be What Happened at Vatican II by John W. O’Malley and Vatican II: Renewal Within Tradition ed. by Matthew Lamb and Matthew Levering. Richard John Neuhaus gives us his view on how they present the council and its continuity with the past. https://www.firstthings.com/article/2008/10/what-really-happened-at-vatican-ii If youContinue reading “Vatican II Interpretation Book Review”

The Doctrinal and Dogmatic Problems with the Cassiciacum Thesis

Although, I would go even farther in some instances than this article it is another great resource at defending the faith from Sedevacantist – like positions. The Cassiciacum thesis was developed by Fr. Guerard and says that the Pope is materially Pope but does not have full Papal powers (like to teach infallibly) Fortunately, forContinue reading “The Doctrinal and Dogmatic Problems with the Cassiciacum Thesis”

The inanity of CTRL-F criticism — Where Peter Is

“This document has 43,000 words. 43,000 words. So that’s a lot. This is—I believe this is his longest encyclical. I didn’t compare it, but it feels like the longest. And I’m going to throw something up on the screen that… The post The inanity of CTRL-F criticism appeared first on Where Peter Is. The inanity ofContinue reading “The inanity of CTRL-F criticism — Where Peter Is”

Sharing Some Resources From obeythepope.com

I recommend all these great article finds filled with quotes from the Church Fathers and true contemporary wisdom. The Whole, True and Perfect Security of the Christian Religion Did the first millennium Church have a higher view of papal authority and infallibility than we do today? http://www.obeythepope.com/2017/10/the-whole-true-and-perfect-security-of.html Did Saint Catherine of Siena and Saint PaulContinue reading “Sharing Some Resources From obeythepope.com”

Vatican II and “weaponized ambiguity” — Where Peter Is

It has become common among critics of the Second Vatican Council to use the expression “weaponized ambiguity” to describe certain conciliar teachings. This expression assumes that language in the Vatican II documents is ambiguous, in the sense that teachings can… The post Vatican II and “weaponized ambiguity” appeared first on Where Peter Is. Vatican II andContinue reading “Vatican II and “weaponized ambiguity” — Where Peter Is”

Information on the Heresy of Feeneysim

An excellent article from Fr. William Most on EWTN has relevant discussions for Vatican II. (Linked Here) One of its final conclusions; “Following proper theological method, the Fathers and the Magisterium saw two things: a)the Church is necessary for salvation; b)In some way God must make provision for those who do not find the Church.Continue reading “Information on the Heresy of Feeneysim”